FAIR Commissioning & Control Working Group
FC2WG/BeamCommissioning  BeamCommissioning (compare)

Difference: BeamCommissioning (r2 vs. r1)

r2 - 05 Feb 2016 - 14:41 - RalphSteinhagen r1 - 28 Jan 2016 - 07:31 - RalphSteinhagen
  

FC2WG_logo.png

  

Welcome to the FC2WG/BeamCommissioning web

FAIR Accelerator Beam Commissioning Procedure Wiki

FAIR Accelerator Beam Commissioning Procedure Wiki

  

The Beam Commissioning (BC) for FAIR is grouped into the following three stages:

FC2WG_wordle.png

  

Stage A) Pilot Beams

  
  • main aim:
    • drive the beam expeditiously through the BeamProductionChain (BPC): from the sources, through the synchrotrons, beam transfers, up to the experimental targets/storage rings
    • check basic 'accelerator mechanics': threading, injection, capture, cool, convert, acceleration/decelerate, stripping & extraction
    • identify beam-related limitations: polarities, RF, beam instrumentation, machine alignment, effective physical machine aperture, ...
  • always done with 'safe' resp. low-intensity/brightness beam
    • initially with 'easily available' ions (e.g. U28+, Ar -> simpler optics, beam dynamics, etc.), then protons (tests transition crossing, etc.)
  

Stage B) Intensity Ramp-up & Special Systems

  
  • main aim:
    • achieving and maintaining nominal machine performance for a limited number of reference beam
    • check that the accelerator design and systems can achieve (near) nominal beam parameters, e.g. beam intensities, nominal transmission and beam losses for e.g. U28+ & proton beams, etc.
  • commissioning of e.g. e-cooler (if not needed earlier), slow extraction, transverse fast feedbacks
  • commissioning and validation of machine protection & interlock systems
  • possibly unsafe operations always preceded by checks with safe beam
  

Stage C) Production Operation with nominal Intensities

  
  • main aim:
    • make fast setup and switch-over between different BeamProductionChains routine
    • push physics and beam parameter performance (intensity, brightness/emittance, momentum spread, ...)
    • identify and improve upon bottlenecks impacting FAIR's 'figure-of-merit
    • improve the machine model using beam-based techniques
  • N.B. first time counted as 'commissioning' or 'assisted operation' → later: 'regular operation'
IAttachmentActionSizeDateWhoComment
FC2WG_logo.pngpngFC2WG_logo.pngmanage 7.5 K 03 Aug 2015 - 14:11RalphSteinhagenFC2WG Logo
FC2WG_wordle.pngpngFC2WG_wordle.pngmanage 119.1 K 03 Aug 2015 - 14:10RalphSteinhagenFC2WG word cloud based on past meeting
IAttachmentActionSizeDateWhoComment
FC2WG_logo.pngpngFC2WG_logo.pngmanage 7.5 K 03 Aug 2015 - 14:11RalphSteinhagenFC2WG Logo
FC2WG_wordle.pngpngFC2WG_wordle.pngmanage 119.1 K 03 Aug 2015 - 14:10RalphSteinhagenFC2WG word cloud based on past meeting
r2 - 05 Feb 2016 - 14:41 - RalphSteinhagen r1 - 28 Jan 2016 - 07:31 - RalphSteinhagen

Revision r2 - 05 Feb 2016 - 14:41 - RalphSteinhagen
Revision r1 - 28 Jan 2016 - 07:31 - RalphSteinhagen
This site is powered by FoswikiCopyright © by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
Ideas, requests, problems regarding FAIR Wiki? Send feedback
Imprint (in German)
Privacy Policy (in German)